Treatment of infection in long bones (Intramedullary nails)
This page is intended to inform healthcare professionals of scientific information available regarding a new or unapproved use of a Biocomposites’ product that is regulated and has been approved/cleared by (US) FDA. The information provided conforms with the guidance issued by the FDA in 2025 on sharing scientific information on unapproved uses (SIUU).
Prophylaxis and treatment of infection in long bones using an antibiotic-loaded ceramic coating with interlocking intramedullary nails
Key points
- ✔ 61 patient retrospective analysis comparing efficacy of antibiotic-loaded STIMULAN-coated interlocking intramedullary nails (IMN) to antibiotic-loaded PMMA-coated IMN.
- ✔ Prophylactic use of STIMULAN-coated IMN prevented infection in 100% (24/24 patients) of high-risk patients treated and resulted in a 95.5% bony union or fusion rate (21/22 patients) and 100% (24/24 patients) limb salvage rate.
- ✔ Early analysis suggests STIMULAN-coated IMN are non-inferior to PMMA-coated IMN in treating infection.
- ✔ Use of STIMULAN-coated IMN was demonstrated to be safe in this small patient cohort.
- ✔ Limitations of this study are the small sample size, its retrospective nature and the shorter follow-up in the STIMULAN-coated IMN group (28.3 months) versus the PMMA-coated IMN group (40 months).
Summary
A study by Downey et al. (2022), titled ” Prophylaxis and treatment of infection in long bones using an antibiotic-loaded ceramic coating with interlocking intramedullary nails”, compared the safety and efficacy of either antibiotic-loaded polymethylmethacrylate-coated intramedullary nails (PMMA-IMN, with vancomycin and tobramycin) or antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate-coated interlocking intramedullary nails (CS-IMN, STIMULAN with vancomycin and tobramycin) to prevent infection in high-risk patients and to eradicate infection when infection is confirmed. In this study, a retrospective review of medical records was conducted for consecutive patients who underwent a limb salvage procedure for infection eradication or infection prophylaxis using either PMMA-IMN or CS-IMN. All patients had a minimum follow-up period of six months.
For infection prophylaxis the efficacy of CS-IMN was evaluated in 24 high risk patients, including those undergoing one-stage conversions from external fixation to internal fixation, patients with a history of recent infection in the planned operative site, who had a history of external fixation for limb lengthening, and patients with a history of an open fracture and resultant non-union. The results demonstrated a 100% (24/24 patients) prevention of infection rate, 95.5% union rate (21/22 patients), and 100% (24/24 patients) limb salvage rate.
For infection eradication the efficacy of CS-IMN (9 patients) was compared with PMMA-IMN (28 patients). In all cases of confirmed infection, the patients were also treated with culture specific intravenous antibiotic therapy for 6 weeks, followed by oral antibiotics. The infection was eradicated in 7/9 patients (77.8 %) in the CS-IMN group versus 21/26 patients (80 %) in the PMMA-IMN group (p = 0.44). Bone union/fusion was achieved in 8/9 patients (88.9 %) in the CS-IMN group versus 21/24 patients (87.5 %) in the PMMA-IMN group (p = 0.11). The limb salvage rate in the CS-IMN group was 100% (9/9 patients) versus 89% (25/28 patients) in the PMMA-IMN group.
Early analysis suggests that CS-IMN is non-inferior to PMMA-IMN for infection eradication. CS-IMN are safe and easy to use. Limitations of this study include a very small sample size, its retrospective nature, and shorter follow-up period in the CS-IMN group.
Publication
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9051659/
Statements
Key Points and Summary prepared by Biocomposites Ltd. The new/unapproved uses of STIMULAN described in this scientific article have not been approved/cleared by the (US) FDA and the safety and effectiveness for the new/unapproved use has not been established.
The (US) FDA approved/cleared use of SIMULAN is available here. These Instructions for Use specify the approved/cleared intended use, indications, contraindications, warnings and precautions.